Helen Suzman died four
years ago this month. She was an indomitable anti-apartheid activist and
politician in South Africa, during its darkest times. She came to represent
what the African National Congress party called “a thorn in the flesh of apartheid”
or, as the South African Prime Minister P.W.Botha preferred, “a vicious little
cat.”
She stood against the
appalling segregationist laws at a time when the white electorate
continued to vote for the party of racism. Helen Suzman established her own
liberal party, and remained that lonely small voice in the vile field of South
African politics for many years. She continued to run for politics, and lead a
party, when she had no hope of “winning”, no ounce of a chance of forming a
government.
The epithet she
deserved, truly, was tenacious.
Tenacity (from the
Greek λληνες meaning “OMG I think
I’m stuck”): the art of hanging on, of pursuing a cause, even if all around you
are losing theirs.
Which brings us neatly
on to what happened here in Israel last Tuesday, a glorious summers day, when
thousands of citizens fanned their barbecues, and headed to the ballot boxes,
via the beaches and the parks.
Israel was voting for
the 19th Knesset, and we had a plethora of political parties to
choose from. So let’s have a quick indulge in a little psephology. And why not?
We deserve it.
For those who can’t
quite remember exactly what the word means, psephology is the study and
analysis of elections. It comes from the Greek ψῆφος for pebble, as the Greeks
used to cast their votes with pebbles.
First you need to
understand Israel’s simplistic, and flawed, electoral system. The system
considers the country as one single consistency, and votes are cast for party
lists; each party submitting an ordered list of candidates prior to the vote.
When all the votes have been counted up, the 120 seats in Knesset are divided
based on a simple proportional division. If the Pyjama Party, for example, gets
10% of the vote, they’ll get 10% of the seats (that is 12).
The Israeli ballot box this week was brought to you by the letter B. Photo: Haaretz |
Of course with any
system, involving maths, figures, equations and remainders, it doesn’t divide
exactly.
Habayit Hayehudi, led
by beamish Naftali Bennet, won 12 seats with 345,935 votes, while just 14,135
votes behind came Shas, led by three men in black suits and beards, which won
11 seats.
While further down the
results table, we find Hatnua, the vehicle for Tzipi Livni, winning 6 seats
with 189,168 votes, while 16,786 votes behind came Meretz, the liberal party,
which funnily enough also got 6 seats.
In other words,
Bennet’s extra 14,000 votes won him an extra seat in parliament, but Tzipi
Livni’s extra 16,000 votes didn’t.
And what about voting
for a party that didn’t manage to pass the arbitrary 2% threshold? We’re
talking about parties that add colour and spice to politics: Ale Yarok (the
Green Leaf party) which believes it would all be so much better if we could
just chill out, got no seats, despite its 45,000 votes (more than 3 times that vote-gap
between Bennet and Shas!); Am Shalem, promoting less religious-secular
divide by treating everyone equally, led by a man with a long beard; Otzma
LeYisrael, one of whose campaign ads was disqualified for being racist, but who
garnered over 60,000 votes; or Dor, formerly the Pensioners Party, which
stunned one and all in 2006 when it won 7 seats in Knesset.
In total, 263,044
people cast votes for parties that failed to win a seat. That’s a lot of
disenfranchised (from the Latin disenfranchisiatorum, meaning “Hey, why
wasn’t I invited?”) citizens out there.
Sure, in other
democracies, there are millions of voters whose choice of candidate doesn’t get
in, but at least they still have their own, constituency-based, representative.
Here in Israel, you have no one.
And then there’s the ephemeral
nature of it all. Politicians jump ship, swap parties, set up new movements,
all in the name of the game and the prospect of a finger in the public pie.
Likud still seems to be running the show, granted (albeit its showing slumped
at the ballot box, despite swallowing up the Israel Beytenu party) while other
parties seem to come and go like the seasons. Kadima, a veteran party of, ooh,
at least six years, was the largest party in the 2006 elections, winning 29
seats. Last week, it plummeted (plummet, from the Greek πίκουρος,
meaning “Hallo! Can anybody hear me up there?”) to only 2. Ehud Barak’s
Independent Party, established in 2011 for reasons I can’t go into here without
spoiling your lunch, didn’t even bother contesting in 2013. While the second
largest party (Yesh Atid) and the seventh (Hatnua) were established just now,
when you popped out to put the kettle on.
Which explains why 53
of the 120 members of Knesset 2013 are brand new politicians. Now don’t worry
about the old ones. They get very generous payments to help them adjust to the
cruel world outside of politics. The minimum “adjustment” grant is NIS111,843,
or one year’s average wage in Israel. In addition, they receive an annual
payment for life to cover phone calls, newspapers, etc., all at the taxpayer’s
expense.
Sorry, I’m wrong, our
politicians are indeed tenacious: Tenacity, from the Hebrew מגיע לי meaning “I’m not giving up
my perks, pull the other one.”
TOTALLY worth the wait! You are the Mike Royko of Israeli politics xo
ReplyDeletethanks for the lesson on israeli politics u r soooo articulate but i still dont get it its funny u dont look Greek
ReplyDeleteroberta lavi ellies mom